California Coastal Commission

LAND FORM ALTERATION POLICY GUIDANCE

VI. SUBDIVISION EXAMPLES

Parcel on Ridge Top with Steep Slope

Key Features to Consider in Lot Layout Plans


Alternative 1 - Conventional Lot Layout.


SITE PLAN CRITERIA

COMMENTS

  • Site Plan Grading and Drainage
  • No consideration of natural topography or landform.
  • Extensive grading required for access roads and all building pads.
  • Extensive stabilization required for development.
  • Steep ridge topography concentrated in Lots 1 & 2. May need large buttress fills or retaining walls.
  • Slope stabilization efforts and development of access and building pads will alter drainage.
  • Access, Circulation and Utilities
  • 1 main access loop to provide emergency access if one part of road is obstructed.
  • Roads can be used for surface drainage control.
  • Extensive grading required for access and clearance.
  • Long extensions for utilities, following roadway.
  • Septic systems would require setback from slope stabilization and water lines.
  • Lot Layout, Buildable Area, Sensitive Resources
  • Extensive grading required for all building pads.
  • Buildable lot area varies:

    Lots 1 & 2 approximately 5-10% level;

    Lots 3 & 4 approximately 25-30% level.

  • No provision of adequate buffer space or open space for landslide or sensitive habitat areas.
  • No preservation of ridgeline.

Alternative 2 - Modified Lot Layout.


SITE PLAN CRITERIA

COMMENTS

  • Grading and Drainage
  • Moderate grading required for access road and private driveways, and less grading for building pads.
  • Natural drainage patterns largely preserved, except where slope stabilization is required.
  • Steep topography concentrated in Lots 1 & 2. May need retaining walls to develop Lot 1.
  • Access, Circulation, and Utilities
  • 1 long access road; toCity/County standards; Locked secondary road for emergency access.
  • Roads can be used for surface drainage control.
  • Additional grading and paving for longer driveways minimum 10' width. on Lots 3 & 4.
  • 1 major point of connection with the main road.
  • Long extensions of electrical, telephone, water and sewer lines to serve residences.
  • Septic systems would require setback from slope stabilization and water lines.
  • Lot Layout, Buildable Area, Sensitive Resources
  • Some grading required for building pad on Lot 1.
  • Buildable lot area varies:

    Lots 1 & 2 approximately 20-30% level;

    Lots 3 & 4 approximately 70-80% level.

  • Adequate buffer /open space is provided for landslide and sensitive habitat areas.
  • 90% of ridgeline is preserved from development.

Alternative 3 - Lot Layout with Lot Line Changes.


SITE PLAN CRITERIA

COMMENTS

  • Grading and Drainage
  • Development concentrated in small, buildable region of parcel, with steep slopes and ridgeline preserved in open space.
  • Minimal grading required for access road and building pads for all lots.
  • No need for large slope stabilization effort of buttress fill; several small retaining walls are used.
  • Natural drainage patterns preserved.
  • Access, Circulation, and Utilities
  • 1 main access road to City/County standards; 4 short, private driveways required.
  • 1 point of connection with the main road; no backup access required due to short length of access.
  • 1 main trench to extend electrical, telephone, water and sewer lines to all residences.
  • No limitations for septic systems.
  • Lot Layout, Buildable Area, Sensitive Resources
  • Smaller lot sizes, each under 1 acre.
  • Minimal grading required for all building pads
  • Buildable Llot area approximately equal: All lots approximately 100% level.
  • Large open space area provides setback from landslide and sensitive habitat areas.
  • Ridgeline is preserved from development.

Return to Section 6 Table of Contents

Return to Part 2 of Section 6 Parcel on Sand Dune

Return to California Coastal Commission Publications List

Return to California Coastal Commission Home Page